Macedonia Blogs » History-of-Macedonia.com » May 21, 2009 » All blogs about Macedonia (Μακεδονία)

16:57

Cultural Atlas for Young People - Ancient Greece by Anton Powell

» History-of-Macedonia.com

15:34

FYROM “Pressed For Name Settlement”

» History-of-Macedonia.com

13:49

Κινητικότητα, εκ νέου, στο ζήτημα της ονομασίας

» History-of-Macedonia.com

Το ενδιαφέρον του διεθνούς παράγοντα και οι πιέσεις για σύντομη λύση στο θέμα της ονομασίας, προκειμένου να προχωρήσει και να ολοκληρωθεί η ένταξη της ΠΓΔΜ στο ΝΑΤΟ και την Ε.Ε. έχουν επανακάμψει, σύμφωνα με χθεσινές δηλώσεις του πρωθυπουργού της γειτονικής χώρας, Νίκολα Γκρούεφσκι. «Υπάρχει αυξανόμενη πίεση και προς την Ελλάδα και προς τη “Μακεδονία”», δήλωσε ο κ. Γκρούεφσκι και πρόσθεσε ότι, αν και δεν τίθενται αυστηρά χρονοδιαγράμματα, η διεθνής κοινότητα πιέζει για λύση. Πρόσθεσε ότι η χώρα του αναμένει από τον Μάθιου Νίμιτς μια πρόταση, η οποία θα αποτελέσει βάση για πρόοδο στη διαδικασία.

Σύμφωνα με διπλωματικές πηγές, ο ειδικός μεσολαβητής αναμένεται αμέσως μετά τις ευρωεκλογές να καλέσει τους διαπραγματευτές Αθηνών και Σκοπίων, πρέσβεις Αδαμάντιο Βασιλάκη και Ζόραν Γιόλεφσκι σε συνάντηση, προκειμένου να γίνει η απαιτούμενη προεργασία. Ακολούθως, μέσα στον Ιούλιο αναμένεται να επισκεφθεί τις δύο χώρες. Από ελληνικής πλευράς, έχει γίνει εισήγηση προς τον ειδικό μεσολαβητή για αλλαγή της επικοινωνιακής τακτικής που ακολουθείται στις συναντήσεις. Η Αθήνα ζήτησε να γίνονται επίσημες, συγκεκριμένες δηλώσεις ως προς το περιεχόμενο ενδεχομένων προτάσεων, προκειμένου να αποφεύγεται η επιλεκτική διοχέτευση πληροφοριών προς τα μέσα μαζικής ενημέρωσης, που είναι συχνά παραπλανητική.

Την ίδια στιγμή, ενεργό ρόλο στη διαπραγμάτευση για το θέμα της ονομασίας διεκδικούν οι Αλβανοί της ΠΓΔΜ. Ολα τα αλβανικά κόμματα των Σκοπίων συμφωνούν σε αυτή τη θέση και ζητούν να συμπεριληφθεί εκπρόσωπος της αλβανικής κοινότητας στις συνομιλίες, προσθέτοντας, μάλιστα, ότι αυτή η εξέλιξη θα έχει αποτέλεσμα την ταχύτερη επίλυση της εκκρεμότητας. Ο πρόεδρος του μεγαλύτερου αλβανικού κόμματος DUI, Αλί Αχμέτι, μετέφερε χθες αυτή τη θέση και σε αντιπροσωπεία της γερμανικής βουλής, που επισκέφθηκε το Τέτοβο. Ταυτόχρονα, εκπρόσωποι των αλβανικών κομμάτων σε δηλώσεις τους επιρρίπτουν ευθύνες στην κυβέρνηση των Σκοπίων για παρέκκλιση από τη Δύση και για χειρισμούς που έχουν αποτέλεσμα την καθυστέρηση της νατοϊκής και ευρωπαϊκής προοπτικής της χώρας. Μάλιστα, προσθέτουν ότι τις δυσμενέστερες επιπτώσεις αυτής της καθυστέρησης υφίστανται οι Αλβανοί και προειδοποιούν την κυβέρνηση και τον πρωθυπουργό, Νίκολα Γκρούεφσκι, με δυναμικές αντιδράσεις σε περίπτωση που καθυστερήσει πολύ η ένταξη της χώρας στο ΝΑΤΟ και την Ε.Ε.

Ο κ. Γκρούεφσκι, απαντώντας σε σχετική ερώτηση χθες, δήλωσε ότι κάθε παράγοντας που μπορεί να συνεισφέρει παραγωγικά, είναι καλοδεχούμενος με προτάσεις και ιδέες, χωρίς όμως να αναφερθεί σε συμμετοχή Αλβανού εκπροσώπου στη διαπραγματευτική διαδικασία

Πηγή: Καθημερινή

Αδαμάντιος Βασιλάκης Ζόραν Γιόλεφσκι Νίκολα Γκρούεφσκι Μάθιου Νίμιτς Καθημερινή ΠΓΔΜ Αλβανοί Μακεδονία

Περισσότερα... »

12:11

Macedonian names and makeDonski pseudo-linguistics: The case of the name Beres

» History-of-Macedonia.com

May 21, 2009

By Miltiades Elia Bolaris

Balkan Illusion - phantasia archaica:

“…it is very interesting to note that many of the authentic ancient Macedonian words, according to their etymology and pronunciation, have a striking resemblance to the appropriate words used in the modern Macedonian language (and other so called “Slav”[sic] languages).”

“Bere(s). The root of this name contains the verb “bere” (to pick up) that exists today in the Macedonian language and in other “Slavic”[sic] languages. Also in the present day Macedonian onomasticon there are names derived from verbs. The name “Bere” is present In todays’ Macedonian onomasticon…”

From: “Similarities between ancient Macedonian and today’s’ Macedonian Culture (Linguistics and Onomastics)” by Aleksandar Donski, celebrity folk “historian” from FYROM.

Beres / Βερης

Aelius Herodianus/Αἴλιος Ἡρωδιανός who lived between 180 and 250 AD, was one of the best known grammarians of antiquity. He was from Alexandria, the old capital of the Ptolemies, in Egypt, the cultural capital of the ancient world, second in learning only to Athens itself. He had also lived in Rome, where he became a friend and acquaintance of the scholar-emperor Marcus Aurelius. Herodianos talked about a city in Macedonia, called Beroia.

Βέροιας πόλις Μακεδονίας, ήν Φέρωνα κτίσαι φασίν, αυτός δέ τό Φ εις Β μεταποιείν, ως Φάλακρον Βάλακρον καί Βίλιππον καἰ Κεβαλίνον. Αλλοι από Βέροιας τού Βέρητος τού Μακεδόνος. Εστί καί πόλις Συρίας.

Ηρωδιανός Γραμματικός, “Περί καθολικής προσοδείας”

Beroea is a city in Macedonia, which they say was built by Pheron, but they (the Macedonians) change PH to B, as from Phalakros to Balakros and to Bilippos (from Phillipos)and Kebalinos (from Kephalinos). Others claim that Beroea is derived from Beres the Macedonian. There is also a city in Syria by the same name.

Herodianos the Grammatist, “Peri catholikes prosodeias”

This is how Herodianos describes the two most popular etymologies of the name of the city of Beroia. In the first version he considers the B a dialectical mis-pronunciation by the Macedonians who famously pronounced B in words where southern Greeks pronounced Ph/Φ. He notes among some other examples the name of the father of Alexander the Great, Phillip II: Philippos/Φιλιππος, which the Macedonians pronounced as Bilippos/Βιλιππος. We can also mention the name of the Ptolemaean queen which other Greeks would have pronounced Pherenike/Φερενικη but the Macedonians pronounced Berenike/Βερενικη, etc. In modern European languages this name appears more in tune with the Macedonian pronunciation: Berenice, or Veronica. So, the name Pherenike (meaning : “the one who brings nike”, nike=victory) in the Northwestern Greek dialect that the Macedonian spoke, it was pronounced as Berenike/Berenikh. Therefore, Herodianos continues, some had claimed that the original founder of the city was Pheron / Φερων (= the Carrier) whose name was pronounced in the Macedonian dialect as: Beron / Βερων.

Thus, according to this founding story, the city that Beron founded was named after him Beroia/Βεροια, instead of what he would have considered as more proper: Pheroia/Φεροια.

At this moment I will take the liberty of making a parenthesis and bring our attention to the point Herodianos just made: the dialectical differences between the more sophisticated Attic Greek, the dialect of Greek that all educated Greeks used for writing after the 5th century BC, and the Macedonian dialect which to southern Greeks seemed rough and uncultured, if not outright barbaric (the heavy and rough sounding Macedonian B instead of the softer Attic Ph, is only one example). It becomes obvious though, to anyone reading Herodianos’s passage above, that he was indeed speaking of dialectical differences of pronunciation among different dialects within the same Greek language. There are still here and there some academics who have spent a lifetime trying to convince themselves and others that the language of the Macedonians was not Greek. Since the spectacular finds at the sites of ancient Aegae and Pella of the last 30 years, that have enriched the Epigraphical corpus, there seem to be fewer and less convincing apologists of the two separate languages theory. When considering the plethora of Greek inscriptions, the deafening absence of any inscription in ANY other language, and when we add to the mix the Pella catadesmos/κατάδεσμος Πέλλης, then the question seems to be passing itself to the hands of Balkan history revisionists and other nationalist groups, and away from the academia.

The Pella cadadesmos is an extensive lead leaf inscription, found in a tomb of a woman of low social status, in the ancient Macedonian capital Pella, and it is written in the Northwestern Greek dialect, akin and similar to Aeolic and Dorian. It is the only inscription found that is written in the local vernacular dialect found to date in Macedonia. Part of the problem of some historians, we must add, is their lack of training in the Greek language, which hinders their ability to read the sources from the original text, and to do research on original epigraphic material, relying instead on translations. The example of the revisionist American professor, at the 7th congress on ancient Macedonia organized by the University of Thessaloníki, who, when confronted with a passage from an original text in Greek proving her wrong, was unable to read it admitting to her lack of training in Greek, was most revealing and extremely humbling to her reputation as an “expert”. But let us continue:

Stephanos Byzantios/Στέφανος Βυζάντιος from Constantinople, compiling his dictionary some centuries later gives us yet another version of a founding story for Beroia, and this one speaks not of Pheron but offers us another take on etymology:

Μιεζα; πολις Μακεδονιας; Στρυμονιον εκαλειτο απο Μιεζης θυγατρος Βερητος του Μακεδονος, ως Θεαγενης εν Μακεδονικοις. Βερης γαρ τρεις εγεννησεν, Μιεζαν, Βεροιαν, Ολγανον, εφ’ ων ποταμος ομωνυμος και πολις Βεροια και τοπος Στρυμωνος.

Στέφανος Βυζάντιος Λεξικογράφος (6ος αι. μ.Χ.), Εθνικα.

Mieza; city in Macedonia which was also called Strymonion; from Mieza, the daughter of Beres the Macedonian, as Theagenes tells us in his Makedonica. Beres had three children, Mieza, Beroia and Olganos [incidentally, it is the personified river Olganos, son of Beres, whose statue we see at the beginning of this article], from whom we have a river by the same name and a city called Beroia and an area named Strymon.

Stephanos Byzantios Lexicographer (6th c AD), Ethnica.

What Stephanos Byzantios tells us above is that according to the local myth the founding of the city (or at least its naming) was attributed to the nymph Beroia, the daughter of the Macedonian Beres/Βερης.

The city of Beroea/Beroia/Berroia/Βερροια (I know the reader by now is getting confused by the multiple variations in the spelling of the city, but it is only in the Latin transliterations that the different spellings of this name occur: in Greek it remains the same, it is always Βέρροια) is well known to Christians because it was one of the first Greek cities that the Apostle Paul visited in Europe, having first passed through three more Macedonian cities: Neapolis/Νεάπολις, Philipoi/Φίλιπποι, Amphipolis/Ἄμφίπολις, Apollonia/Ἄπολλωνία and Thessalonike/Θεσσαλονίκη. We know of the dream Paul saw while in Troad:

καὶ ὅραμα διὰ τῆς νυκτὸς ὤφθη τῷ Παύλῳ· ἀνήρ τις ἦν Μακεδὼν ἑστὼς, παρακαλῶν αὐτὸν καὶ λέγων· Διαβὰς εἰς Μακεδονίαν βοήθησον ἡμῖν. ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ 16:9

And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us. Acts 16:9

In Macedonia indeed he went, and by Macedonia we mean the historic Macedonia, not the Makedonijan wannabe neighbor of Kossovo: Paul never put his foot on what is now FYROM:

In Thessalonica (which the modern yugo-Slavs and Bulgarians call it Solun) Paul was able to convert several of the locals:

καί τινες ἐξ αὐτῶν ἐπείσθησαν καὶ προσεκληρώθησαν τῷ Παύλῳ καὶ τῷ Σίλᾳ, τῶν τε σεβομένων Ἑλλήνων πολὺ πλῆθος γυναικῶν τε τῶν πρώτων οὐκ ὀλίγαι.ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ 17:4

And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, and of the chief women not a few.Acts 17:4

After Thessalonica he went to Berroia, where:

10 Οι δε αδελφοι ευθέως δια της νυκτος εξέπεμψαν τόν τε Παυλον και τον Σίλαν εις Βέροιαν, οιτινες παραγενόμενοι εις την συναγωγην απηεσαν των Ιουδαίων. 11 ουτοι δε ησαν ευγενεστεροι των εν θεσσαλονικη οιτινες εδεξαντο τον λογον μετα πασης προθυμιας καθ ημεραν ανακρινοντες τας γραφας ει εχοι ταυτα ουτως 12 πολλοι μεν ουν εξ αυτων επίστευσαν, και των Ελληνίδων γυναικων των ευσχημόνων και ανδρων ουκ ολίγοι.

Πράξεις Aποστόλων 17:10,11,12

10 The brothers immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea, and when they arrived they went into the Jewish synagogue. 11 Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so. 12 Many of them therefore believed, with not a few Greek women of high standing as well as men.

Acts 17:10,11,12

Paul mentions the small community of the Jews living in the city of Berroia, but he also mentions that “not a few” Greek women and men, indeed of high social standing, believed in his message. The same as we saw had happened earlier in Thessalonike. Passages like this speak volumes about who the ancient Macedonians were and what language they spoke. If this was in 19th century Thessalonica, or Berroia, we would have heard of not only Greeks and some Jews, but also Turks, and Serbs, Gypcies, Bulgarians and Slavomacedonians, but these would have to wait centuries yet to appear in Macedonia. For now in the 1st cAD, in Roman occupied Macedonia we hear the bible mention as inhabitants only Greeks and some communities of Jews and the Roman administrators too, especially numerous in Philippoi. Any differentiations in dialect or state allegiance that the Macedonians of the 4th cBC had as compared to the other Greeks further south have now melted away: They are all simply Greek now, as show in these scriptural quotes.

The epigraphic record is full of mentions of the city of Berroia or of people from Beroia, and all show its Greek character and the names we encounter are all Hellenic.

n an inscription of Perinthos in Thrace, now part of Turkey, we read the following inscription:

Regions : Thrace and the Lower Danube (IG X) : Thrace and Moesia Inferior

Perinthos-Herakleia 31 Previous Inscription Perinthos-Herakleia 30 Perinthos-Herakleia 32 Next Inscription

Thrace — Perinthos-Herakleia (Marmara Ereğlisi) — 3rd c. AD

Πύθια ἐν Τρωάδι Ἀλε-

Pythian (games) in Troy Ale-

ξάνδρεια Ὀλύμπια ἐν Βεροίᾳ,

xandreian Olympics in Beroia

Ἁδριανὰ Ὀλύμπια ἐν Κυζίκῳ,

Adrianian Olympics in Kyzikos

Πύθια ἐν Καλχαδόνι κοινὰ

Pythian (games) in Kalchedon common

In other words, we have a part of a larger list of Athletic games, the typical Panhellenic games of the Greeks everywhere, sometimes called Olympic, for Zeus, somethimes Pythian for Apollo, and other. In Beroia they were called Ἀλεξάνδρεια Ὀλύμπια ἐν Βεροίᾳ/Alexandreia Olympia en Berroia: Olympics in Beroia, in honor of Alexander. This kind of games were not held by Skythians, Thracians, Illyrians or Roman, they were particular to the Greeks, nobody else, not until their re-refounding by Pierre de Coubertin in the late 19th century at least…

We also know that Beroia was operating as a typical Greek city, with its own city government (hardly a barbarian operation) as the following inscription attests:

Regions : Northern Greece (IG X) : Macedonia

EKM 1. Beroia 111

Macedonia : Bottiaia: Beroia

Β]εροιαίων [ἡ βουλὴ]

κ]αὶ ὁ δῆμος [— — —]

the parliament of the Beroians

and the municipality

Sometime ago, I photographed a partial of a Greek statue at the Skopje Museum whose base has the following Greek inscription:

ΑΔΥΜΟΣ ΕΥΑΝΔΡΟΥ ΒΕΡΟΙΑΙΟΣ ΕΠΟΙΕΙ

Adymos Evandrou Beroiaios Epoiei

Αdymos son of Evandros from Beroia Created this

It was found in the Yugoslav village of Marvinci, by Valandovo, in the ancient Amphaxitis.

A very similar inscription is found in Thessaly in Central Greece:

IG IX,2 601

Thessaly (IG IX,2) : Pelasgiotis: Larisa

Εὔανδρος Εὐάνδρου Βεροιαῖος ἐποίε[ι].

Evandros son of Evandros from Beroia created this.

This shows of course that a well known family of Greek sculptors was producing in a local marble sculpture studio in Beroia, right about the 1st c AD and their products were being commissioned from Thessaly to Paeonia.

Then, on a very long list of names inscribed around 230 to 220 BC, on an inscription from the PanHellenic Oracle and sanctuary of Delphi, among literally hundreds of names of various Greek cities from all over the Hellenic world, we see some cities from Macedonia and we copy them. Next to the name of the city we read the names of the representatives o the Panhellenic congress or competition or religious event for which the inscription was dedicated:

Regions : Central Greece (IG VII-IX) : Delphi

BCH 1921:1

ἐν Δίωι Μέντωρ Ἀγαθοκλέους Πολυκλῆς

in Dion Mentor son of Agathocles, Polykles

ἐν Πύδναι Ἀρχίας Φίλιππος Διο[ν]υσογένης

in Pydna Archias Philippos Dionysogenes

Ἀλκιμάχου

son of Alkimachos

ἐν Βεροίαι Ἀντάνωρ Νεοπτολέμου

in Beroia Antanor son of Neoptolemos

Μένανδρος Ἀπελλᾶς Φιλώτα

Menandros son of Apellas of Philotas

ἐμ Μέζαι Νικωνίδας Νικάνωρ Μνασιγένεος

in Mezai Nikonidas Nikanor son of Mnasigenes

ἐν Ἐδέσσαι Μοσχίων Τριάκας Μόσχος

in Edessa Moschion Triakas Moschos

ἐν Πελλαῖ Ἀπολλωνίδης Δίφιλος Χάρης

in Pella Apollonides Diphylos Chares

These are all very typical Greek names: hardly the type of typical proto-Slavic names, in other words that would corroborate a non Hellenic, Slavic identity for the ancient Macedonians. The south Slavic tribes, if we remember, came into Macedonia from ukraine and Belorussia, not less than 800 years after this inscription was written.

Rivers of propaganda ink have been spent by the Skopje regime in FYROM and by its drum beating apologists in Canada and Australia to promote a fake pseudo-Makedonism for some of the citizens of FYROM. This fake identity is built as part and parcel of the promotion of a venomous ethnic hatred against their Greek neighbors to their south. To achieve their own usurpation of the identity of the ancient Macedonians, they first have to wrest it away from the cultural inheritors of the ancient Greeks of Macedonia, the modern Greeks, who are the only people who without any special education in the classics can still read and substantially understand, even now, these very inscriptions of the ancient Macedonians, because they still speak their ancestral language.

The right wing irredentist nationalists from FYROM on the other hand (and some of their their mouthpieces who regretfully continue to pollute this progressive forum with ethnic hatred venum) blatantly claim to be continuing an age long hatred that the ancient Macedonians supposedly harbored against the other Greeks. What they in fact are doing is to project their own irredentist, land-grabing, racist, and xenophobic agenda, clumsily dressed in colors of a folkloric dressed, fake antiquity.

Let us now try to experience through an example from the epigraphic record how the ancient Macedonians expressed their alleged burning hatred of Greece. An ancient Greek inscription from the Macedonian city of Pydna, reads as follows:

SEG 50:623

Macedonia : Pieria: Pydna

— — — —]όνου

Βεροιαῖος καὶ ἡ γυνὴ αὐτοῦ Ἑλλὰς καὶ ὁ υἱὸς αὐτῶν Μένανδρος.

first name missing — — son of— —]onos

Beroiaios (from Berroia) and his wife

Hellas and their son Menandros.

While we are missing in this inscription the name of the husband, we have the ending of his paternal name “-onos”, we are also told that he is a Beroiaios, a Berroian, a man from Berroia. We are additionally given in the inscription the name of his son, Menandros, and the name of his wife: Hellas/Ἑλλὰς.

Hellas in the language of the Greeks means: Greece. Putting this in modern terms, I would say that it would be highly unlikely to find a Turk having a wife named Hellas or a Serb having a wife named Albania, or yet a Palestinian having a wife named Israelia. You always give names of something beloved and dear to you, not something which you hate.

Έλληνας Μάριος/Hellenas Marios is a young modern Greek Cypriot poet who was born in Larnaca, Cyprus, in 1975, one year after the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. I suppose the fact that his Greek Cypriot parents named their newborn boy Hellenas/Έλληνας meaning “Greek man”, in 1975, had something to do with how they felt towards Greece. The same consideration, we must assume, held true with the parents of the baby girl named Hellas-Greece by her ancient Macedonian parents. The Macedonians felt antagonistic towards the southern Greeks, but they also admired their level of culture, and they always strove to catch up with them, especially that of Athens.

In every day Greek speech, modern Greeks and modern Cypriots speaking of each other may out of convenience say Hellenes kai Kyprioi/Greeks and Cypriots (as the ancients said Hellenes kai Makedones, Greeks and Macedonians), but at the end of the day they know that they are all part of the same ethnic community. Modern Italians of the north of Italy do make spiteful jokes about the Italian of the south, and some even advocate for the split between the north and south of Italy into two separate states, but the motives are economic, not ethnic: nobody disputes the basic Italian nature of each of the other side, despite speaking very different dialects and despite their vast economic differences. On a different note, we all refer to the Austrians and to the Germans as separate nations, and they consider themselves as such (but not during the WWII) yet the realization stands that, to the outsider at least, an Austrian is still basically a German of the “Eastern Kingdom”: Österreich – Austria. Now go tell that to an Austrian…he will be as upset as telling an ancient Theban that he was the same as a Macedonian, especially after Alexander destroyed his city, or tell to an ancient Melian that he was the same as an Athenian, after Athens destroyed his city and sold him to slavery! It took Rome for the Greeks, and that includeded Macedonians, Aetolians, Peloponnesians, Epeirotans and Asian Greeks or the Greeks of Egypt to all feel in their skin their Hellenic commonality beyond Economic, dialectical, tribal or other city state considerations.

Back to Berroia again and five centuries earlier: Long before Christianity and St. Paul, the Athenian historian Thucydides mentions Beroia, in his Peloponnesian War:

1.61] Ἦλθε δὲ καὶ τοῖς Ἀθηναίοις εὐθὺς ἡ ἀγγελία τῶν πόλεων ὅτι ἀφεστᾶσι, καὶ πέμπουσιν, ὡς ᾔσθοντο καὶ τοὺς μετ‘ Ἀριστέως ἐπιπαριόντας, δισχιλίους ἑαυτῶν ὁπλίτας καὶ τεσσαράκοντα ναῦς πρὸς τὰ ἀφεστῶτα, καὶ Καλλίαν τὸν Καλλιάδου πέμπτον αὐτὸν στρατηγόν, οἲ ἀφικόμενοι ἐς Μακεδονίαν πρῶτον καταλαμβάνουσι τοὺς προτέρους χιλίους Θέρμην ἄρτι ᾑρηκότας καὶ Πύδναν πολιορκοῦντας. προσκαθεζόμενοι δὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ τὴν Πύδναν ἐπολιόρκησαν μέν, ἔπειτα δὲ ξύμβασιν ποιησάμενοι καὶ ξυμμαχίαν ἀναγκαίαν πρὸς τὸν Περδίκκαν, ὡς αὐτοὺς κατήπειγεν ἡ Ποτείδαια καὶ ὁ Ἀριστεὺς παρεληλυθώς, ἀπανίστανται ἐκ τῆς Μακεδονίας, καὶ ἀφικόμενοι ἐς Βέροιαν κἀκεῖθεν ἐπὶ Στρέψαν καὶ πειράσαντες πρῶτον τοῦ χωρίου καὶ οὐχ ἑλόντες ἐπορεύοντο κατὰ γῆν πρὸς τὴν Ποτείδαιαν, τρισχιλίοις μὲν ὁπλίταις ἑαυτῶν, χωρὶς δὲ τῶν ξυμμάχων πολλοῖς, ἱππεῦσι δὲ ἑξακοσίοις Μακεδόνων τοῖς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Παυσανίου· ἅμα δὲ νῆες παρέπλεον ἑβδομήκοντα. κατ‘ ὀλίγον δὲ προϊόντες τριταῖοι ἀφίκοντο ἐς Γίγωνον καὶ ἐστρατοπεδεύσαντο.

Θουκιδιδης 1-61

The Athenians also immediately received the news of the revolt of the cities. On being informed that Aristaeus and his reinforcements were on their way, they sent two thousand heavy infantry of their own citizens and forty ships against the places in revolt, under the command of Callias, son of Calliades, and four colleagues. [2] They arrived in Macedonia first, and found the force of a thousand men that had been first sent out, just become masters of Therme and besieging Pydna. [3] Accordingly they also joined in the investment, and besieged Pydna for a while. Subsequently they came to terms and concluded a forced alliance with Perdicas, hastened by the calls of Potidaea, and by the arrival of Aristaus at that place. They withdrew from Macedonia, [4] going to Beroea and thence to Strepsa, and, after a futile attempt on the latter place, they pursued by land their march to Potidaea with three thousand heavy infantry of their own citizens, besides a number of their allies, and six hundred Macedonian horsemen, the followers of Philippos and Pausanias. With these sailed seventy ships along the coast. [5] Advancing by short marches, on the third day they arrived at Gigonus, where they encamped.

Thucydides 1-61

Reading this text by Thucydides, we are immediately struck by a geographic paradox. We have to look at a map to understand what is happening: The Athenian hoplites, the heavy infantry are leaving Pydna, which is a city in Pieria, and they go to Strepsa/Στρέψα, having first stopped at Beroea. We are fairly certain from archaeological identifications ( [epigraphy.packhum.org] ) that ancient Strepsa was by the modern village of Basilica/Bασιλικἀ, just west of Thessaloniki, part of the Pylaia municipality (Demos Pylaias/Δήμος Πυλαίας). Marching to Potidaea, which was their destination, the heavily armed Athenian hoplites moved, we must assume, directly to their point of interest, and they did not wander around to go sight seeing, heavily clad in iron and bronze as they were. Now then here is the paradox: why would these Athenian hoplitae first go to Beroea, which is completely out of their way, being directly West / Northwest of Pydna? To go from Pydna to Potidaea, which is at the narrowest point of Pallene (now called Cassandreia, the first prong peninsula in Chalkidice), they should have headed North East, not North West, as they had left Pydna. Then, after crossing Axios they should head directly East, go around what is now Thessaloniki (but at that time was still Therme) towards Strepsa, and then proceed on to Potidaea. Something does not make sense here…why should they go to Beroea first?

We read Thucydides again, and now we notice that he has already given us the answer: ἀπανίστανται ἐκ τῆς Μακεδονίας, καὶ ἀφικόμενοι ἐς Βέροιαν κἀκεῖθεν ἐπὶ Στρέψαν :They withdrew from Macedonia, going to Beroea and thence to Strepsa. Therefore, this Beroea is not the Beroea we know…it is not the Beroia in Macedonia! There was another Beroea/Βερροια!

We need to understand that Macedonia at the 5th century stopped at the Axios river. Therefore, Thucydides is speaking of a different Beroia here, one that must be placed between the Axios river and Strepsa, probably between Chalastra / Χαλαστρα and Thessaloniki / Therme. Now, finally, the text makes sense: The geography falls in place. Gigonos is by modern Nea kallikrateia, Strepsa and Potidaea are all close to each other, and the Beroia which Thucydides mentions must be close by, not too far from Thessaloniki, but for sure East of the Axios river, in what was then part of geographic Thrace. What does this mean? It simply means that there is yet another Beroia in the prairies, east of Axios river, besides the one we all know and the bible mentions, in Macedonia next to the Bermion mountain. This one was located in what the 5th century Greeks considered part of Thrace.

Reading and searching further, we find yet another Beroia in what is now Bulgaria: the major modern Bulgarian city of Stara Zagora was also a Beroia, also mentioned as Beroe. Ian Worthington in his wonderful book “Philip II of Macedoni” (Yale University Press, 2008, page 124) mentions it as a foundation of the great Macedonian king, at the same approximate time as the building of the city Philippoupolis, further south. Whether he actually built it from zero and named it such, or used a previous settlement with the same name to further fortify it and re-populate with Macedonians as was typically the case for Philip and later Alexander, is not clear from the sources, but the name stands. During the Roman times it had been temporarily renamed Augusta Trajana, but when the Byzantine army under the emperor Ioannes II, Comnenos (Ιωάννης B’ ο Κομνηνός) defeated the Petcheneg army in 1122, the battle passed into history as the battle of Beroia. This is still in the land of the ancient Thracians. We also know of another Beroia in Syria. It was established by the Hellenistic Greeks who gave the name of their city back in Macedonia, as they had with another Edessa in Syria, thus the Syrian Beroia does not pose for us any problem, it is explainable as a name loan.

The fact that there are at least three Beroias that we have seen up to now poses an obvious question. Maybe Beroia the name has a meaning. In other words, Beroia, the name of the city mentioned in the founding fables of the Macedonian Beroia that were passed on to later generations, were simply attempts to explain a name that the Greek speaking Macedonians themselves did not really understand. If the name is not Greek, then it is pre-Macedonian. Archeological digs in modern Beroia concluded that Beroia has been inhabited since at least the 10th century BC and probably before that. We also know that before the Macedonians it was the Thracians and the Phrygians that inhabited the land of Emathia where Beroia lies. In other words we must look to Phrygian and Thracian to understand the meaning of the name Beroia. Their languages are now extinct and hardly anything survives of them. But we are lucky. We have Strabo, the ancient geographer coming to our rescue:

καὶ Ὀδησσὸς Μιλησίων ἄποικος͵ καὶ Ναύλοχος Μεσημβριανῶν πολίχνιον· εἶτα τὸ Αἷμον ὄρος μέχρι τῆς δεῦρο θαλάττης διῆκον· εἶτα Μεσημβρία Μεγαρέων ἄποικος͵ πρότερον δὲ Μενεβρία͵ οἷον Μένα πόλις͵ τοῦ κτίσαντος Μένα καλουμένου͵ τῆς δὲ πόλεως βρίας καλουμένης θρᾳκιστί· ὡς καὶ ἡ τοῦ Σήλυος πόλις Σηλυμβρία προσηγόρευται͵ ἥ τε Αἶνος Πολτυμβρία ποτὲ ὠνομάζετο·

Γεωγραφία 7.6.1

and Odessus, a colony of the Milesians, and Naulochus, a small town of the Mesembrianoi. Then comes the Haemus Mountain, which reaches the sea here; then Mesembria, a colony of the Megarians, formerly called “Menebria” (that is, “city of Menas,” because the name of its founder was Menas, while “bria” is the word for “city” in the Thracian language. In this way, also, the city of Selys is called Selybria and Aenus was once called Poltyobria).

Strabo Geographia 7.6.1

So, Strabo explains to us that Bria means “city” in Thracian. And indeed he tells us that the ending of many Thracian towns in “-bria” is just that, the equivalent to Greek polis i.e. Alexandroupolis, Philipoupolis, later to be extended to such American cities as Mineapolis and Anapolis, or Ukranian cities such as Sympheropolis/Симферополь, etc.

Strabo mentions Selymbria, Poltyobria, Menebria, and we also know from Herodotus of a Combreia / Κώμβρεια in Chalkidike:

7.123 [2] ἐκ τῶν προσεχέων πολίων τῇ Παλλήνῃ, ὁμουρεουσέων δὲ τῷ Θερμαίῳ κόλπῳ, τῇσι οὐνόματα ἐστὶ τάδε, Λίπαξος Κώμβρεια Αἷσα Γίγωνος Κάμψα Σμίλα Αἴνεια·

7.123 [2] from the cities which come next after Pallene and border upon the Thermaïc gulf; and the names of them are these,–Lipaxos, Combreia, Lisai, Gigonos, Campsa, Smila, Aineia;

From other sources we also know of Skelambria / Σκελαβρία, Mascombria / Μασκοβρία, Bolbambria / Βολβαβρία, Salambria / Σαλαμβρία, as well as town in Thrace called Brea / Βρέα, an area in Thrace called Briantice / Βριαντική, as well as Bra/βρα and Symbra/Συμβρα. Hesechios in his dictionary tells us that “bria meant a farmland town, as well as fort, a castre-protected area” (βρία εσήμαινε την επ´ αγροίς κώμην, ως και φρούριον, τόπον οχυρόν).

Looking in Asia Minor, we also find Phrygian cities called Garsavara of Cilicia/Γαρσάβαρα Κιλικίας, Atabyris/Ατάβυρις, Kibyra of Phrygia/Κίβυρα Φρυγίας as well as Bria/ Βρία, between Eumeneia and Sebaste, next to the Burgas Dagh mountain. Whose coins were epigraphed: ΒΡΙΑΝΩΝ.

When we look back at our Indo-European common language, we see that the original word was *bhergh which originally meant “high”, and also “hill”. The Greek word Boreas/ Βoρέας (originally the wind from the mountains, the northern wind) comes from this word. But the north Germanic word for mountain “berg” is also derived from it, as does the word Iceberg in English and the Russian word Bereg which means “high river bank”. But since the primitive Indoeuropeans found protection on the high hills where they built their wall-protected towns, the original word *bhergh for high and hill eventually came to mean: “a castle on a high ground”. In French it became “bourg” as in Luxembourg (=the luxurious, or full of light castle), in German it became “burg”, as in Hamburg (Originaly named: Hammaburg: Riverside castle or Beechwood castle).

Bourg and burg are in turn also related lingusistically and semanically to the Greek word Pyrgos/Πυργος, meaning castle, as well as to the the Celtic word : “-briga”. The Iberian peninsula is litterally dotted with untold Celtic toponyms ending in -briga,. In Portugal there is Londobris/Λονδοβρίς (*Lond-o-brig-s - wild fortress) just off the Lusitanian coast (if this toponym sounds related phonetically to the Londin of England it is because they are linguistically related, indeed). Then we encounter Talabriga/Ταλάβριγα (*tala + briga - fortres by the river Tala), but also Langobriga, Ierabriga, Caetobriga, Larcobriga etc. In Spain we find Λακόβριγα/Lacobrigenses (Pliny III 3 26); Langobriga (*Lak-o-briga: ‘Lake Fortress’). Sarabriga or Salabriga or Salabris/Σαλαβρίς (almost an issogloss with the Thracian Sylibria, modern Silivi, in Eastern Thrace) (*Sara-brig-s: - the town/fort by the Sara River, now called in its Spanish translation: Torre del Sabre), between the provinces of Salamanca and Zamora. We also find in Spain cities such as Deobriga, Alpobriga, Nertobriga, Ardobriga, Colubriga, and numerous others, all Celtic toponymns.

Morein [www.uwm.edu]

6_15/garcia_alonso_6_15.html].

In France we find Iliberis which rhymes with our Beres, but we also encounter th Franco-Latin Burgundia (the highlands), and in England we find “-bury”: Bury, Salisbury, Bloomsbury, Norbury, Kingsbury, Canterbury, as well towns ending in “-borough”: Thornborough, Thomborough, etc. The words brigand which means the man away from the law up on the mountains and of course the word “fort” and all the forts and the towns ending in “-fort”, or “-furt” like Frankfurt are also related linguistically to the Macedonian Berroia.

In Phrygian and Thracian it became Bria / βρια. Once the Macedonians and the other Greeks took over these places, beginning after the collapse of the Mycenaeans, and for sure after the 10th c BC, they pronounced some of them Bria, others Brea and yet others Beroea/Berroia/Βέρροια.

The mythical name Beres, was a name by which the Greek speaking Macedonians attempted to rationalize the unknown to them name of the city Beroia, whose etymology they did not understand. Beroia, like Strymon and Mieza were names that were pre-existing in the area, they had encountered and adopted from the local Thracian and other populations whom they conquered. Through the ages, any and all of the autochthonous Thracian and other people remaining in Macedonia were linguistically assimilated by the Macedonians and the meaning of Beroia in the language of the old inhabitants was eventually forgotten.

The Greek speaking Macedonians created their own etymologies after a while, weaving myths with river Gods like Strymon and Nymphs like Beroia, the daughter of Beres that gave her name to the city. Beroia was now theirs, a Macedonian city, and so was her father, the mythical Beres, who in their myths became one of their very own too, becoming nothing less than the son of the fabled progenitor of all the Macedonians: Macedon/Μακεδών.

Source: American Chronicle

Beres Macedonia Macedon Μακεδών Beroia Pheron Alexander Strabo Greeks Hellenes Cyprus Serb Larnaca

Περισσότερα... »

skip to content Macedonia Blogs » History-of-Macedonia.com » May 21, 2009
Όλα τα blogs για τη Μακεδονία με μια ματιά Home Search	Πληροφορίες Πληροφορίες για το site Καταχωρήστε το blog σας Συχνές ερωτήσεις (FAQ) Blogging για αρχάριους		Pass Free Internet με Extra! ΝΕΟΣ αριθμός: 899 300 300 300 Username: pass Password: free Δωρεάν Μουσική, SMS, WebVoice κ.α.

Macedonia Blogs » History-of-Macedonia.com » May 21, 2009

Feeds

History-of-Macedonia.com (6)

Greece by Fodors

Cultural Atlas for Young People - Ancient Greece by Anton Powell

CSI: NY Makedonia, Greece

FYROM “Pressed For Name Settlement”

Κινητικότητα, εκ νέου, στο ζήτημα της ονομασίας

Macedonian names and makeDonski pseudo-linguistics: The case of the name Beres